Trying out some new services:, State, Branch, Medium, Kippt, Buffer

Over the past couple of weeks I have joined a variety of new services including, State, Branch, Medium, Kippt, Buffer.
I recently backed my first kickstarter-ish project ever and decided to join (AppDotNet or ADN). People keep asking me if I think it can ever compete with Twitter or will it ever reach critical mass or if it will stay a ghost town like Google+? For me the question is not whether ADN will be able to “replace” Twitter but rather I see it as a reflection of the current zeitgeist. ADN is not simply an ad-free alternative to Twitter. Instead, alternatives to major platforms such as Facebook and Twitter are increasingly gaining momentum. ADN is definitely not the first, think for example of Diaspora (launched as a Facebook alternative) and (formerly Status.Net) which calls itself “a stream oriented social network service” (FAQ). Both services never really went mainstream, maybe because they were both ahead of their time.

ADN, at a first glance, seems similar to but there is one important distinction which also differentiates it from Twitter because with “You can install the StatusNet software that runs on your own servers, since it’s Free and Open Source software. You can make groups, and share privately with those groups.” This allows you to run on your own server, a decentralized model, while both Twitter and ADN rely on a centralized model. ADN follows a centralized model which is very common for the current era of social media platforms. As a platform, ADN is operating as software as service, “a software delivery model in which software and associated data are centrally hosted on the cloud,” and offers an API for developers. The API is the main core of ADN and is only one possible way of how an ADN application or service can look or function. Two great write-ups deal with these issues: First, Dan Wineman describes the relation between the social graph, publishing and aggregation and how social platforms like Twitter and ADN deal with these differently, and second, Orian Marx describes what ADN is, could possibly be and how it is different from its alternatives. Yes, ADN costs 50 dollars (or 100 if you are a developer) and it is still a centralized service but I can’t even begin to describe what has been developed with the ADN API in less than three weeks.

ADN isn’t the only thing that is currently brewing as an alternative to Twitter which is increasingly shutting out other services and third-party developers. Dave Winer hypothetically proposes a “A microblogging server that’s a simple install on EC2 or Rackspace or any other easy cloud-based server in other words, a decentralized easy self-install Twitter alternative in the cloud.  Another initiative that is currently buzzing in the blogosphere is “a protocol for open, decentralized social networking” which looks interesting but Winer reminds us that “What matters is what software is supporting the protocol, what content is available through it and how compelling is the content.” There is also critique on developing Yet Another Protocol while it could use existing protocols, which reminded me of the following XKCD comic on standards:

My username is @silvertje if you would like to contact me on ADN. I have created a Google Doc which lists about 80 other Dutch ADN users, @adrianus has built Appnetizens streams, a “Tweedeck” like interface for ADN (for which I did some CSS-color-advice) with multiple column-view and tons of other features such as a “Netherlands” view with all known Dutch users, @frankmeeuwsen has started a blog titled Appdotnet Culture which documents ADN’s early developer and user culture and @richardk writes about ADN developments. I’ve also created an IFTTT recipe that allows you to cross-post selectively from Twitter to ADN whenever the tweet contains the hashtag #adn.


I started using Buffer to cross-post some messages from Twitter to ADN using an IFTTT recipe I created: Send Tweets with Hashtag #ADN to via Buffer However, IFTTT just added ADN as a channel to their service so I don’t have to pipe everything through Buffer anymore, so until I find another use for this service I am putting it on pause.

At the first glance State looks like a Netvibes made for the platform & cloud era. It’s not simply a service to aggregate your streams because State also allows you to interact with your streams. In other words, you can reply to your Tweets and ADN posts and when you click on a user it brings you to the user profile displayed within State. However, not all actions that can be performed on objects within these platforms are available yet. You can also add RSS feeds but it is not immediately clear how this works. You can “search” for a feed, where it seems to search the web for your query and then grabs the feed from these results. When I ego-search for myself I get feeds for my Flickr photos, Quora profile etc but I cannot seem to find the main feed for my own blog. Adding a custom feed by URL would be a great option. I’ve only used it for a few hours but I love it so far and ReadWriteWeb calls it “A Streams App Of The Future“. It looks clean, minimal and good and they respond very quickly to feature suggestions (they implemented a reply to Instagram photos function after I suggested it on Twitter!), always a bonus :)

Update: Joshua from State kindly answered my question concerning the RSS feature. State is currently using “Google’s Feed API ( to search for feeds using the text you type into the box” which interestingly enough brings up the feeds for my presence elsewhere but not my own blog.


Branch, Medium, Kippt

Branch, Medium, Kippt are three more new platforms I joined recently for publishing, discussing and link sharing but so far I have merely glanced at them, as one can only spend so much time online.

On a final note, I’m happy to contribute as a female to the all these new services which are dominated by “alpha geeks” aka white males according to BuzzFeed’s latest article on the early adopters of these platforms.

17 thoughts on “Trying out some new services:, State, Branch, Medium, Kippt, Buffer

  1. Pingback: Anne Helmond
  2. Pingback: Anne Helmond
  3. Pingback: Dave Winer ☮
  4. Pingback: Mathew Ingram
  5. Pingback: Brian Phipps
  6. Pingback: Ignorante BOT
  7. Pingback: nate tkacz
  8. Pingback: Brian Phipps
  9. Pingback: Arjan de Jongh
  10. Pingback: Bull Mancuso
  11. Pingback: Vince Outlaw
  12. Hi Anne,

    Nice and helpful read. Going to try State, because I loved Netvibes, but somehow grew out of fashion (for me). Never had a good alternative. Maybe State does the new stream/cloud job…?

    Would love to read your opinion on Branch, Medium and Kippt, though… Bring it on!

    1. You’re welcome, and thanks! Yes, I’ll definitely write about the other three once I get a chance to try them out. I can definitely recommend signing up for a State invite, it’s very clean and basic but doing a powerful and great job.

  13. Pingback: Tim McCormick
  14. Another way to look at is is from a technical point of view: the TENT initiative is a new protocol on which others can build (decentralized) services. This way users can own their data, etc etc.

    I can imagine access providers offering a TENT account next to the existing POP, http, news etc. accounts.

    BTW I don’t have the skills to see which protocol is the most promising. TENT just one example, but there are more in the works.

    1. Absolutely. Great addition. While ADN (AppDotNet) offers an open API on top of their platform, Tent offers a protocol which operates on a different level.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *