<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs declared dead&#8230; again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/</link>
	<description>Anne Helmond. New Media Research Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masters of Media, New Media MA Amsterdam &#187; I tweet you this: &#8220;Obama wins, but &#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-54291</link>
		<dc:creator>Masters of Media, New Media MA Amsterdam &#187; I tweet you this: &#8220;Obama wins, but &#8230;&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annehelmond.nl/?p=615#comment-54291</guid>
		<description>[...] for the rallies can already be organized within 24h after the news. Especially in the light of the multiple times that blogs are declared dead while Twitter (and alike) are pointed to as being the future applications. Events like this show [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the rallies can already be organized within 24h after the news. Especially in the light of the multiple times that blogs are declared dead while Twitter (and alike) are pointed to as being the future applications. Events like this show [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh MacLeod: &#8220;Blogs aren&#8217;t dead, people are&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-51967</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh MacLeod: &#8220;Blogs aren&#8217;t dead, people are&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annehelmond.nl/?p=615#comment-51967</guid>
		<description>[...] different angles. Blogs are alive and kicking, in contrast to the provocative Wired article that once again declared blogs dead. Speaker Scott Rafer referred to the article as the &#8220;perfect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different angles. Blogs are alive and kicking, in contrast to the provocative Wired article that once again declared blogs dead. Speaker Scott Rafer referred to the article as the &#8220;perfect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-51531</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annehelmond.nl/?p=615#comment-51531</guid>
		<description>Great comment on the narcissism that drives many of the popular web2.0 services.

The demise of the blogosphere is an interesting meta view. Regarding to what&#039;s wrong with the blogosphere my take would be its fragmentation and distributed nature. Due to current technology implementations and constraints a few blogging features do not function optimally: commenting and linking. I previously described these issues in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/04/where-do-you-leave-your-comments/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Where Do You Leave Your Comments?&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogherald.com/2008/01/07/on-using-manual-andor-automatic-link-notification-systems/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;On Using Manual and/or Automatic Link Notification Systems&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment on the narcissism that drives many of the popular web2.0 services.</p>
<p>The demise of the blogosphere is an interesting meta view. Regarding to what&#8217;s wrong with the blogosphere my take would be its fragmentation and distributed nature. Due to current technology implementations and constraints a few blogging features do not function optimally: commenting and linking. I previously described these issues in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/04/where-do-you-leave-your-comments/"  rel="nofollow">Where Do You Leave Your Comments?</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/01/07/on-using-manual-andor-automatic-link-notification-systems/"  rel="nofollow">On Using Manual and/or Automatic Link Notification Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjerk timan</title>
		<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-51528</link>
		<dc:creator>tjerk timan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annehelmond.nl/?p=615#comment-51528</guid>
		<description>As a comment on the wired-article:
First of all, it strikes me as a weird fact that one wants to get his message out that blogging is dead as best as possible, and therefor chooses to use... a blog.
Moreover, the point made about not getting read as a blogger is of course a nonsense; the same goes for your average dusty holiday-flickr account or all the narcisistic youtube-efforts...And since a large chunk of editors on Wiki are software, one cannot really state that wiki is the new personal, interactive stage, either. 

As a comment on your comment:  
I do agree that sns, youtube, flickr and microblogging are seen in better light as complementary media rather than competative.

But apparently, everybody want to coin the demise of the blogosphere (why is this?). So something must be troubling, or wrong with it... Any light on where these comments come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a comment on the wired-article:<br />
First of all, it strikes me as a weird fact that one wants to get his message out that blogging is dead as best as possible, and therefor chooses to use&#8230; a blog.<br />
Moreover, the point made about not getting read as a blogger is of course a nonsense; the same goes for your average dusty holiday-flickr account or all the narcisistic youtube-efforts&#8230;And since a large chunk of editors on Wiki are software, one cannot really state that wiki is the new personal, interactive stage, either. </p>
<p>As a comment on your comment:<br />
I do agree that sns, youtube, flickr and microblogging are seen in better light as complementary media rather than competative.</p>
<p>But apparently, everybody want to coin the demise of the blogosphere (why is this?). So something must be troubling, or wrong with it&#8230; Any light on where these comments come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Helmond</title>
		<link>http://www.annehelmond.nl/2008/10/21/blogs-declared-dead-again/comment-page-1/#comment-247747</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Helmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annehelmond.nl/?p=615#comment-247747</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New blog post: Blogs declared dead... again http://tinyurl.com/5z83fs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New blog post: Blogs declared dead&#8230; again <a target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/5z83fs"  rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5z83fs</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

